Taken from the roll call in the town’s own minutes. The minutes record who was not there and almost never why.
What was decided (4 motions)
3 carried, 1 recorded otherwise. Every motion below is printed as the minutes print it.
WHEREAS report ACS2022-PIE-PS-0084 recommends amending the City of Ottawa Zoning By-law to permit back-to-back townhouse dwellings; and WHEREAS inconsistencies were identified between Document 4 – Draft Site Plan and Document 2 – Details of Recommended Zoning; THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that with respect to ACS2022-PIE-PS-0084, Planning Committee Recommend Council approve the following: Document 2 be amended by adding the following to item 2(b): Despite Table 160A, the minimum interior side yard setback for a townhouse dwelling in a Planned Unit Development on the north side of the parcel is 1.48m. Document 2 be amended to add a new bullet point under item 2(b) maximum building height – 9 metres THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that there be no further notice pursuant to Section 34(17) of the Planning Act.
Moved by Councillor L. Dudas
Carried
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT Planning Committee defer the item until the August 25, 2022, Planning Committee meeting and authorize that staff may submit a revised report to Committee, if required.
Moved by Councillor S. Menard
Carried
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT Planning Committee defer motion no PLC 2022-67/9 until the August 25, 2022, Planning Committee meeting.
Moved by Councillor J. Leiper
Carried
WHEREAS the public meeting with respect to the application related to 100 Steacie Drive was held on February 4, 2021 WHEREAS during the seventeen months that have passed since the original consultation was held, there has been a change in Councillor and multiple planners on this application; WHEREAS the community has noted that there is currently no sign in front of 100 Steacie Drive and many thought the application was no longer active; WHEREAS there has been no communication between the current Ward Councillor and the developer and the recent briefing with staff did not convey the level of community concern, WHEREAS there is now considerable and significant community concern being expressed from the Kanata Beaverbrook Community Association, residents, business owners and the former Councillor who has extensive knowledge of the area; WHEREAS due to the dormancy of this file and the length of time since the public meeting, the new Councillor did not fully appreciate the community concerns that were raised during the public consultation, nor have time to consult with community leaders; WHEREAS a deferral to the next Planning Committee on August 25, 2022 would allow for this item to rise to the same Councill meeting as items considered at Planning Committee on July 7, 2022; THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the item 6.4 of Planning Committee’s agenda 67 be