Taken from the roll call in the town’s own minutes. The minutes record who was not there and almost never why.
What was decided (7 motions)
7 carried, 0 recorded otherwise. Every motion below is printed as the minutes print it.
WHEREAS changes introduced by updates to Secondary Plans and the City’s Official Plan are required to align with the 2024 Provincial Planning Statement (PPS); and WHEREAS these changes will provide increased potential density around strategic growth areas, such as major corridors, and around existing and planned transit stations; and WHEREAS due to direction from the province in the PPS, the City has a statutory obligation to permit developers to apply for urban boundary expansions; and WHEREAS these expansion proposals may occur outside the normal process of urban boundary expansion that follows population growth planning; and WHEREAS the City will soon be undertaking a reassessment of its population growth projections; and WHEREAS the City is also undertaking a significant update of its Zoning By-law to be more permissive of a wider range of housing types in a greater number of areas; and WHEREAS these changes are unlikely to be fully reflected in the Transportation Master Plan (TMP), Infrastructure Master Plan (IMP), or Asset Management Plans (AMPs) which may have previously relied on old zoning or secondary plan assumptions to predict future needs. THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Joint Planning and Housing Committee and Agriculture and Rural Affairs Committee recommend Council direct staff to undertake a review of the TMP, IMP, and AMPs after conducting a population forecast update; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this review include a consideration for development with
Moved by C. Curry
Carried
WHEREAS staff have provided an updated calculation regarding the number of hectares for strategic growth area designations within the Riverview Major Transit Station Area and the Pleasant Park Major Transit Station Area; and WHEREAS the updates alter the number of people and jobs to be planned within these major transit station areas; and WHEREAS staff propose site specific amendments at 1245 Kilborn Avenue in Supporting Document 1, Appendix B, Volume 2, through amendment number 2.5; and WHEREAS staff consider the minimum density target at 1245 Kilborn Avenue to be similar as a Hub within document 4 only for the purposes of planning for the PPS target people and jobs at the Pleasant Park MTSA; THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Supporting Document 1, Appendix A, Volume 1 Amendments to Report ACS2025-PDB-PS-0043 be amended by revising amendment number 1.8, Table 3a as follows: For the Riverside MTSA row and Mainstreet minimum density target column, replace “n/a” with “120”; and For the Pleasant Park MTSA row and Minor Corridor minimum density target column, replace “100” with “80”. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Supporting Document 4 to Report ACS2025-PDB-PS-0043 be amended as follows: 1. For Riverside Station, delete Mainstreet 0 ha Minor Corridor 0 ha Planned People and Jobs 3,900 and replace with Mainstreet 5 ha Minor Corridor 4 ha Planned People and Jobs 5,600 2. For Pleasant Park Station, delete Hub 1 ha Planned People and Jobs 10,600 and replace with Hub 4 ha Planned People
Moved by C. Curry
Carried
WHEREAS the proposed amendment to the Rockcliffe Park Secondary Plan designates a portion of the Hemlock Minor Corridor for building heights up to four storeys between Juliana Road and Lansdowne Road South; and WHEREAS the properties at 550 and 560 Maple Lane East have primary frontage on Maple Lane East rather than Hemlock Road and are not in keeping with the Minor Corridor condition; and WHEREAS 550 Maple Lane East is a contributing property in the Rockcliffe Park Heritage Conservation District (HCD); and WHEREAS the proposed amendment acknowledges the heritage value and character of the Rockcliffe Park HCD through its proposed policies related to compatibility in Section 4.1. THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the properties at 550 and 560 Maple Lane East be removed from Document 1, Appendix D, Schedule F, Rockcliffe Park Secondary Plan – Schedule A – Designation Plan as lands to be redesignated to Residential Multi-Unit (up to 4 storeys) ; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that staff be directed to consider the proposed new policies 4.1 (6) and (7) in the Rockcliffe Park Secondary Plan related to ensuring compatibility with the heritage values and attributes of the Rockcliffe Park HCD as part of the final draft of the New Zoning By-Law.
Moved by D. Brown
Carried
have received additional submissions relating to the proposed amendments in report ACS2025-PDB-PS-0043 – City-wide – Provincial Planning Statement 2024 – Consistency Amendments; and WHEREAS staff have considered the submissions and recommend changes to the proposed amendments. THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that City Council delete and replace the following amendments from Document 1, Appendix B: Volume 2 Amendments.
Moved by T. Kavanagh Staff
Carried
WHEREAS 1335 Prince of Wales Drive is currently designated for six storeys; and WHEREAS the property has sufficient lot depths to accommodate increased height; and WHEREAS the property is immediately adjacent to a Neighbourhood High-Rise designation. THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that notwithstanding the maximum building height within the Carleton Heights Secondary Plan, 1335 Prince of Wales permit a maximum height of nine storeys. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that staff prepare the necessary amendments to the secondary plan through this Official Plan Amendment.
Moved by R. Brockington
Carried
WHEREAS Section 5 of the Official Plan contemplates transects; and WHEREAS Section 5.3 of the Official Plan pertaining to the Outer Urban Transect defines this transect as being comprised of “neighbourhoods inside the Greenbelt;” and WHEREAS Section 5.3 of the Official Plan pertaining to the Outer Urban Transect seeks to achieve recognition of a “suburban pattern of built form and site design”; and WHEREAS Section 5.4 of the Official Plan pertaining to the Suburban Transect defines this transect as being comprised of “neighbourhoods within the urban boundary located outside the Greenbelt”; and WHEREAS Section 5.5 of the Official Plan pertaining to the Greenbelt and Rural Transect areas notes that “despite its predominantly rural and natural character, these lands are located within the City’s urban boundary and separates the Outer Urban Transect from the Suburban Transect area”; and WHEREAS the Greenbelt is not a clear boundary between Outer Urban and Suburban as there are some communities that exist neither within the innermost boundary of the Greenbelt nor outside the outermost boundary Greenbelt in the manner contemplated in the Official Plan; and WHEREAS communities within the Greenbelt were therefore determined to be Outer Urban for the purposes of the Official Plan; and WHEREAS the constraints imposed by the National Capital Commission and Federal Government’s ownership of lands within the Greenbelt are such that some communities that are surrounded by the Greenbelt may
Moved by L. Dudas
Carried
WHEREAS report entitles Provincial Planning Statement 2024 – Consistency Amendments (ACS2025-PDB-PS-0043) recommends the adoptions of Official Plan Amendment 46 as presented in Document 1; and WHEREAS staff require a revision to the minimum density target per net hectare in supporting Document 1, Appendix B, Volume 2 Amendments, amendment number 2.47 5.4 O-Train Minor Corridor, new policy 5; THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Document 1, Appendix B, Volume 2 Amendments, amendment number 2.47 5.4 O-Train Minor Corridor, new policy 5 be amended to reflect the following revision from 10 to 100 dwellings per net hectare: 5) The O-Train Minor Corridor designation is planned for a minimum density target of 10 100 dwellings per net hectare. Net hectares refers to privately-owned lands prior to any potential severance or division and excludes private road areas that provide the same function of a public right-of-way