The Ottawa Record

Planning Committee

September 23, 2021

Who was there

Present (7): Laura Dudas, Glen Gower, Allan Hubley, Catherine Kitts, Jeff Leiper, Shawn Menard, Tim Tierney

Taken from the roll call in the town’s own minutes. The minutes record who was not there and almost never why.

What was decided (7 motions)

7 carried, 0 recorded otherwise. Every motion below is printed as the minutes print it.

WHEREAS the Scott Street Community Design plan anticipates a larger park at the corner of Burnside and Slidell; WHEREAS the Scott Street Community Design plan proposes a western boundary aligning with the eastern side of Stonehurst Avenue. THEREFORE IT BE RESOLVED that pages 31 and 32, as found in Document 2 of the report and page 36, as found in Document 4 of the report, be revised with the documents enclosed [1] . THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that there be no further notice pursuant to Subsection 34 (17) of the Planning Act .
Moved by Councillor J. Leiper
Carried
WHEREAS the community wishes to clarify the intent of the proposed amendment to the Scott Street Secondary Plan with respect to the permissible number of diplomatic missions or offices (limited to embassy uses) in the Institutional – Embassies designation; WHEREAS the wording of the proposed amendment suggests the intent to limit diplomatic missions and offices (limited to embassy uses) to a maximum of five; and WHEREAS the Concept Plan (Document 6) shows five lots for embassies. THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the following be added as a new provision under Section 2(d) of Document 3 as found on page 35 of the report: x. Maximum number of offices (limited to embassy uses) or diplomatic missions: 5 THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that there be no further notice pursuant to Subsection 34 (17) of the Planning Act .
Moved by Councillor J. Leiper
Carried
WHEREAS preserving the maximum amount of green space will help mitigate the climate and storm water effects of this development; and WHEREAS the community is opposed to an above-ground parking structure that would have a negative effect on views; THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Section 13 of the Official Plan Amendment, as found on page 30 of Document 2, be revised by deleting “Parking is encouraged to locate in a building or underground” and substitute with the following wording “Parking is encouraged to be underground , or sensitively screened, and is prohibited above the ground floor. ”
Moved by Councillor J. Leiper
Carried
S. Moffatt: WHEREAS Report ACS2021-PIE-PS-0106 recommends zoning changes to the lands known municipally as 6301 and 6475 Campeau Drive; AND WHEREAS the properties at 6301 and 6475 Campeau Drive are two separate properties but are owned by the same entity with a 20 metre wide City owned parcel located between them; AND WHEREAS some of the parking associated with one site is intended to be located on the other, providing an efficient use of land; AND WHEREAS there is some uncertainty over the interpretation of the one lot for zoning purposes provision and an interest to provide some clarity; THEREFORE IT BE IT RESOLVED that the following change be made to Document 4 – Zoning Details of the staff report: 1. The exceptions in Document 4 be amended to add the following provision in Column V: 1. Despite anything to the contrary, the cumulative required parking between the two parcels may be shared between lands zoned with exceptions XXX1 or XXX2 That there be no further notice pursuant to Section 34 (17) of the Planning Act .
Moved by Co-Chair
Carried
S. Moffatt WHEREAS Report ACS2021-PIE-PS-0106 recommends zoning changes to the lands known municipally as 6301 and 6475 Campeau Drive; AND WHEREAS the words “taller than 10 storeys” was erroneously added to the report; AND WHEREAS there are no proposed buildings above 10 storeys; THEREFORE IT BE IT RESOLVED that the words “taller than 10 storeys” immediately following the word “Buildings” be deleted from the report on pages 7, 14, 27 and 28, respectively; That there be no further notice pursuant to Section 34 (17) of the Planning Act .
Moved by Co-chair
Carried
S. Moffatt WHEREAS the property at 6301 Campeau Drive is a mixed-use building that is predominantly residential; and WHEREAS the property at 6301 Campeau Drive zoning details previously applied the parking requirement for a building containing only residential units; THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Document 4 be revised to add the following provision in Column V with respect to Exception XXX2: 1. Section 101 (5) (d) and (e) with all necessary modifications apply to the dwelling units in a mixed use building. That there be no further notice pursuant to Section 34 (17) of the Planning Act .
Moved by Co-chair
Carried
WHEREAS Report ACS2021-PIE-PS-0107 includes a cash-contribution pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act of $100,000.00 towards traffic calming measures in the areas surrounding the property at 861 Clyde Avenue presently located in Ward 15; and WHEREAS Ward 7, 15, and 16 boundaries are to be realigned within the next 14 months; and WHEREAS the property at 861 Clyde Avenue will be part of Ward 16 after the realignment; and WHEREAS as a result of Ward Boundary realignment, traffic calming measures introduced to the surrounding area may also include Bay Ward; and WHEREAS the traffic calming measures will be introduced after the boundary realignments; THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the $100,000 cash contribution for traffic calming not go to the Ward 15 account but be divided fifty percent each between Wards 7 and 16. THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that there be no further notice pursuant to Section 34 (17) of the Planning Act .
Moved by Councillor J. Leiper
Carried

The town’s own record

Read the minutes this page was read from →

Where this page and that document disagree, the document is right and this record is wrong. Say so and it will be corrected.