Special Joint Meeting of the Planning Committee and the Community and Protective Services Committee

G. Gower WHEREAS on page 7 of the report, the quote referencing Recommendation 2 does not accurately reflect the staff recommendation as written on page 1 of the report. THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT, with respect to report ACS2022-PIE-GEN-0008, the paragraph referencing Recommendation 2 be deleted in its entirety and be substituted with the following wording: Recommendation 2: Direct Planning, Real Estate and Economic Development (PRED) and Community and Social Services (CSSD) Staff to, as a joint-departmental work plan item, explore the feasibility and identify potential resource implications to the adoption and implementation of a By-law under Section 99.1 of the Municipal Act , to prohibit without replacement the full or partial demolition or conversion of residential and rental housing of six or more units without a permit issued by the City, possibly by amending the Demolition Control By-law, and report back by Q2 2023.

WHEREAS Council directed staff through Motion 44/18 to prepare a report for consideration by Committee and Council that would outline all the municipal tools available to the City of Ottawa to prevent or prohibit such "renovictions" in the City of Ottawa, including a review of any by-laws, policies or programs that may be used by other municipalities in an effort to prevent the further loss of affordable rental units. WHEREAS The term “renoviction” refers to “those evictions that occur when a landlord undertakes renovations to a rental property and then replaces the evicted tenants with those who would pay higher rents after the renovations are completed.” WHEREAS the organization ACORN (Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now) advocates housing rights for low- and moderate-income people; WHEREAS ACORN’s members have highlighted a greater concern of renovictions within the City of Ottawa, with little or no municipal authority to protect tenants and ACORN solicited legal advice from Raven Law Firm on whether the City of Ottawa had the authority to implement certain regulatory instruments that other municipalities have implemented to reduce renovictions and uphold maintenance standards, including (1) an Anti-Renovictions By-Law like the one in New Westminster, BC; (2) a landlord licensing or registration by- law, like the one in Toronto; or (3) a Tenant Assistance Policy, like the one in Burnaby, BC. Further, we have been asked to respond to the City of Ottawa’s s

WHEREAS the Definition of “Renoviction” is as follows : A renoviction is a type of eviction in which a tenant is displaced due to extensive renovations in the rental unit. WHEREAS Ottawa has declared a homelessness and affordable housing crisis, and WHEREAS there are currently approximately 10,000 households on Ottawa’s Social Housing Registry waiting list; an average wait of up to 5 to 7 years WHEREAS local research has noted that for every new affordable rental housing developed in Ottawa, between 7 and 15 affordable units are

G. Gower BE IT RESOLVED that the meeting time be extended past 7:00 p.m. pursuant to Subsection 8.(1)(c) of Procedure By-law 2021-24.

WHEREAS staff will be seeking a revised Assessment Report to reflect current market conditions and will be conducting further feasibility analysis on all designated PMTSAs (in accordance with Document 1, Item 10); THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT, with respect to report ACS2022-PIE-EDP-0013, the Joint Committee recommend Council direct staff to undertake the following: 1. Consider a minimum set-aside rate of 10% for ownership housing across all PMTSAs; 2. Consider a set-aside rate of up to 10% for purpose-built rentals in all PMTSAs; 3. Include unit mix requirements in the official plan policies or zoning regulations that implement inclusionary zoning to ensure that a sufficient number of multi-bedroom units are set aside as affordable; 4. Consider opportunities to deepen affordability for rental and condominium units in order to maximize access down to 40th percentile income households; 5. Consider including an official plan policy pursuant to paragraph 10 of subsection 3(1) of Ontario Regulation 232/18 that would allow off-site units only where those units are to be assumed by a non-profit housing provider; FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED that staff be directed to report back to Council on these directions as part of the final Implementation report and amending by-laws; further, that staff report back to Council a second time on Directions 1 and 2 above at the completion of its feasibility analyses for each PMTSA.

WHEREAS the City of Ottawa has declared a Housing Emergency, recognizing that there is a clear and urgent need to increase the supply of affordable housing across the City; WHEREAS the new Inclusionary Zoning will increase the number of available affordable units; WHEREAS Inclusionary Zoning is not new to Ontario, and was put into law in 2016 by the provincial government, and is being actively considered by multiple municipalities in the province, and has already been legislated by the City of Toronto, easily the largest new construction market in the Country, and one of the largest on the continent; WHEREAS the report currently calls for a default set-aside rate of zero percent for purpose built rental units, until the City retains a consultant to conduct a market analysis of each PMTSA individually and only then will they recommend an increase or decrease in the set-aside rates; WHEREAS the City already has retained a consultant that could quickly conduct a market analysis of each PMTSA; THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that, with respect to report ACS2022-PIE-EDP-0013, the review of each PMTSA be conducted as soon as possible and that staff report back on the findings to change the set-aside rates shortly thereafter. THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that staff consider the feasibility of a 20% set-aside rate for owner-occupied condominium units in line with the City's own definition of affordability and report back as part of the implementation report.

WHEREAS the City of Ottawa has declared a Housing Emergency, recognizing that there is a clear and urgent need to increase the supply of affordable housing across the City; WHEREAS there is a lack of functionally accessible units in Ottawa and even fewer affordable accessible units; WHEREAS, on average, those with accessibility needs, such as seniors and individuals with disabilities, are statistically more likely to require affordable housing; WHEREAS there is a significant variation in the definition of accessible, dependent on the source cited, and this open definition can, and often does hinder the development of functionally accessible units; WHEREAS the City of Ottawa has already developed accessibility design standards; THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, with respect to report ACS2022-PIE-EDP-0013, that staff study how to include fully accessible units, according to the City of Ottawa’s own accessibility design standards, and report back with recommendations as part of the IZ implementation guidelines.

WHEREAS the City of Ottawa has declared a Housing Emergency and recognizes that there is an urgent need to increase the supply of affordable housing and specifically rental units; WHEREAS the report currently recommends a 25-year affordability period for purpose-built, rental units; WHEREAS the City has acknowledged “renovictions” are taking place in Ottawa, and are resulting in a loss of affordable housing; WHEREAS many buildings, as part of life cycle upgrade requirements, would require renovations after the 25 year mark; WHEREAS the affordability period set for purpose-built, ownership units is recommending 99-years; WHEREAS there are a limited number of areas across the City where inclusionary zoning can be implemented; THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that, with respect to report ACS2022-PIE-EDP-0013, staff report back, as part of the implementation guidelines, any tools available to the City to limit the use of “renovictions” for long-term rental units in particular. In addition, staff report as well, on the feasibility, and impact, of extending the affordability period for purpose-built, rental units.

G. Gower WHEREAS municipalities can only implement Inclusionary Zoning (IZ) in in Protected Major Transit Station Areas (PMTSAs) and lands subject to Community Planning Permit Systems; and WHEREAS expanding IZ to additional geographic areas in the City would increase the number of affordable ownership and rental units being built; THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT with respect to report ACS2022-PIE-EDP-0013, the Joint Committee recommend Council request the Mayor and Co-Chairs of Planning Committee and CPSC write a joint letter to the Minister of Housing and Municipal affairs to request that Inclusionary Zoning be expanded beyond PMTSAs, for example along transit priority corridors and other areas in close proximity to transit.

WHEREAS offsets and financial incentives have been used by other municipalities in inclusionary zoning policy to encourage viability and uptake by builders; and WHEREAS the framework and staff report do not contemplate financial offsets beyond a future Affordable Housing Community Improvement Plan (CIP); THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that, with respect to report ACS2022-PIE-EDP-0013. staff be directed to explore and evaluate additional offsets that could be implemented as part of the Inclusionary Zoning policy and regulations and report back to council in in 2023.

G. Gower WHEREAS page 17 of the report contains a table outlining the maximum affordable housing prices for ownership units for each income decile that requires additional qualifications; AND WHEREAS a computational error was identified in Table 2; THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the paragraph preceding Table 2 on page 17 of the report be replaced with the following: “The below Table 2 demonstrates that ownership households in the moderate income range can sometime afford a condominium unit but no other form of housing. Note that the table only considers the shelter costs associated with a mortgage and property tax; if shelter costs are defined to include condominium fees and utilities, as the CMHC does, then that would have an impact on the below values and reduce the maximum affordable housing price.”; and THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER RESOVLED that Table 2 on Page 17 of the Report be replaced with the following: Figure 15(a): Average Resale House Prices in Ottawa Compared to Affordable House Prices based Household Income Deciles: The City of Ottawa; 2021 All Households Income Deciles (2021 Estimates) Maximum Affordable House Price Residential Condominium Total $743,309 $426,874 $671,801 Low Income Deciles 1-3 ($61,645 and less) $93,643 No No No $163,279 No No No $226,581 No No No Moderate Income Deciles 4-6 (From $61,646 to $117,109) $288,901 No No No $356,080 No No No $430,451 No Yes No High Income Deciles 7-9 ($117,110 and above) $520,080 No Yes No $649,776 No Yes No $841,462 Ye