Taken from the roll call in the town’s own minutes. The minutes record who was not there and almost never why.
What was decided (4 motions)
3 carried, 1 recorded otherwise. Every motion below is printed as the minutes print it.
WHEREAS report ACS2024-PDB-PS-0078 - Demolition Control By-law Amendment (the Report) was
Moved by G. Gower
Deferred
WHEREAS; Document 1 in the report includes a holding symbol -h within the recommended zoning, and staff have advised that the holding symbol should be removed; and WHEREAS staff have revised Document 1 and request that it replace the currently published version; THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the current version of Document 1 be removed and replaced with the amended version to accurately outline the Location and Zoning of 6310 and 6320 Hazeldean Road; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that pursuant to subsection 34(17) of the Planning Act, no further notice be given.
Moved by G. Gower
Carried
WHEREAS Report ACS2024- PDB-PS-0086 does not include the standard Recommendation regarding written notice following Council’s adoption of an Official Plan Amendment, pursuant to Subsections 17 (23) and (23.1) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, AND WHEREAS Subsection 17 (23.2) requires that such written notice include a brief explanation of the effect, if any, that written submissions received before Council made its decision, and oral submissions made at the public meeting, had on its decision, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the following be added as Recommendation 3 of the Report: 3. That Planning and Housing Committee approve the Consultation Details Section of this report be included as part of the ‘brief explanation’ in the Summary of Written and Oral Public Submissions, to be prepared by the Office of the City Clerk and submitted to Council in the report titled, “Summary of Oral and Written Public Submissions for Items Subject to the Planning Act ‘Explanation Requirements’ at the City Council Meeting of 18 September 2024” subject to submissions received between the publication of this report and the time of Council’s decision.
Moved by G. Gower
Carried
WHEREAS the subject report includes the approval of Kanata North Economic District (KNED) Urban Design Guidelines; WHEREAS the KNED Urban Design Guidelines are an important tool in the establishment of new parameters for both built form and the public realm within the district; WHEREAS the Urban Design Guidelines include specific direction associated with the built form for low, mid and high-rise buildings; WHEREAS the KNED Urban Design Guidelines provide guidance related to high-rise tower separation in the district; WHEREAS high-rise tower separation is an important consideration for liveability, including shadowing, privacy, wind impacts, and overall impacts on the public realm; WHEREAS to meet the aforementioned policy objectives, the Council-approved high-rise design guidelines require a tower separation of 23 metres for high-rise buildings up to 30 storeys, and 25 metres above 30 storeys, in all suburban transects; WHEREAS the context associated with the district and the desire to achieve adequate tower separation for the aforementioned reasons has been further reviewed since report publication and staff have determined that a minimum separation distance of 23 metres should be maintained so that this is consistent with the approach in all suburban transects; WHEREAS the draft KNED Urban Design Guidelines also include direction regarding the delivery of an improved public realm, including the provision of active and green rights-of-way, which may require refinement follo