Taken from the roll call in the town’s own minutes. The minutes record who was not there and almost never why.
What was decided (2 motions)
2 carried, 0 recorded otherwise. Every motion below is printed as the minutes print it.
WHEREAS the City of Ottawa has not yet undertaken a comprehensive inventory and evaluation of Ottawa’s “mid-century modern” architecture; and, WHEREAS the classification of buildings constructed in the “mid-century modern” period cannot be classed as “unique” or “excellent” examples until a comprehensive inventory of their contemporaries has been systematically completed. WHEREAS in the interim, the use of the term “representative” should be used as permitted in Ontario Regulation 09/06; THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Statement of Cultural Heritage Value listed as Document 5 of this report be amended as follows: “The Crabtree House has design value as an excellent example of modernist residential architecture in Ottawa” be replaced with “The Crabtree House has design value as a representative example of modernist residential architecture in Ottawa.”
Moved by B. Padolsky
Carried
WHEREAS with respect to report ACS2023-PRE-RHU-0006, a request for deferral has come forward in order to align with the timing of the associated Zoning By-law amendment report for Planning and Housing Committee; and WHEREAS the applicant has agreed to an extension of the statutory timeline under the Ontario Heritage Act to align the timing of the applications. THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT, with respect to report ACS2023-PRE-RHU-0006, Built Heritage Committee approve the deferral of the report indefinitely until the associated Zoning By-law amendment report is scheduled to rise to Planning and Housing Committee at a yet to be determined date.