The Ottawa Record

Planning Committee

September 26, 2019

Who was there

Present (3): Riley Brockington, Glen Gower, Jeff Leiper

Taken from the roll call in the town’s own minutes. The minutes record who was not there and almost never why.

What was decided (2 motions)

2 carried, 0 recorded otherwise. Every motion below is printed as the minutes print it.

WHEREAS Report ACS2019-PIE-PS-0069, Zoning By-law Amendment – 1950 Scott Street, 312 and 314 Clifton Road seeks to rezone the subject lands and; WHEREAS Recommendation 2 indicates “that the implementing Zoning By-law not proceed to Council until such time as the agreement under Section 37 of the Planning Act is executed”; and WHEREAS the applicant has control over the property only through a Purchase and Sale Agreement with final sale contingent on the Zoning By-law amendment being in effect; and WHEREAS the current property Owner will not sign the Section 37 Agreement; THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that in order for the applicant to be able to sign the required Section 37 Agreement, report Recommendation 2, which indicates that the implementing By-law not proceed to Council until such time as the Section 37 agreement is executed, be deleted; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the details of recommended zoning (Document 2) be amended to include the following provision applicable to the new exception [xxxx]: “A holding symbol is placed on the property and that holding symbol may only be removed once the Section 37 Agreement, or similar development agreement, has been executed, which must occur prior to Site Plan Control approval”; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Document 1 – Location Map be replaced with the attached location map to include the “h” suffix in the zone code to represent a holding symbol; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that pursuant to the Planning Act, subsection 34(17) no
Moved by Councillor J. Leiper
Carried
WHEREAS Report ACS2019-PIE-PS-0098, Zoning By-law Amendment – 412 Sparks Street seeks to rezone the subject lands, including an increase in the maximum permitted height limit; and WHEREAS Section 64, Permitted Projections above the height limit, does not permit projections above the height limit for properties subject to Schedules 11 to 88; and WHEREAS 412 Sparks Street is identified in Schedule 11; and WHEREAS review of the proposed development, including the height of the mechanical penthouse, has determined no adverse impacts on view protection and the foreground and background views of Parliament; THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that in order to permit projections above the height limit in accordance with Section 64 of the Zoning By-law, that 412 Sparks Street be removed from Schedule 11; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that pursuant to the Planning Act , subsection 34(17) no further notice be given.
Moved by Councillor T. Tierney
Carried

The town’s own record

Read the minutes this page was read from →

Where this page and that document disagree, the document is right and this record is wrong. Say so and it will be corrected.