Planning Committee

WHEREAS the Old Ottawa East Community Association has raised concerns about the future potential re-development of the subject lands; AND WHEREAS staff have met with the community association and the applicant to discuss these concerns; AND WHEREAS an agreement has been reached on proposed changes to the recommended zoning that will permit the development, while addressing the community’s concerns; BE IT RESOLVED that Document 2 – Details of Recommended Zoning of the staff report be amended as follows: 1. By replacing the maximum building height of 11 metres proposed in exceptions R1TT[XXX1], R1TT[XXX2], and R1TT[XXX3] with 10 metres; 2. By changing the legend of Map 1 such that Areas A and C are now shown as being rezoned to TM[XXXX] H(20), instead of TM H(20); 3. By adding a new exception, TM[XXXX] H(20), with a provision that states the minimum front yard setback is 2 metres, the maximum front yard setback is 3 metres, and subsection 197(4) continues to apply; and, 4. By adding the following provision to Column V of proposed exceptions R1TT[XXX1], R1TT[XXX2], R1TT[XXX3], R3Q[XXX1], R3Q[XXX2], and R3Q[XXX3]: “- For the purposes of calculating the maximum permitted building height for the initial construction of a residential use building, the definition of grade in Section 54 is to be used.” BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that there be no further notice pursuant to Section 34 (17) of the Planning Act.

That the Planning Committee recommends that Council, sitting as Committee of the Whole, approve the Planning Committee 2016 Draft Operating and Capital Budget, as follows: 1. The Planning and Growth Management (excluding Ontario Building Code) Budget as follows: a) User fees (p. 8-15); b) Operating Resource Requirement (p. 7); 2. The Building Code Services - Ontario Building Code Budget as follows: a) User Fees (p. 17-19); b) Operating Resource Requirement (p. 16). 3. The Affordable Housing Budget Operating Resource Requirement (p. 20). 4. The Planning Committee Capital Program (p. 21) [individual projects listed p. 32, 34].

WHEREAS clarification is needed on the definitions of several terms in Document 2 and Document 3; AND WHEREAS clarification is needed for one of the conditions for density redistribution; AND WHEREAS a mislabelled Section heading needs to be corrected; BE IT RESOLVED that Document 3 – Amendment XX to the Official Plan including the Uptown Rideau Street Secondary Plan of the staff report be amended as follows: 1. By replacing the existing definition of “public realm” proposed in Section 6.0 with the following: “The public realm in the CDP area includes streets, publicly accessible pathways and lanes, parks, privately owned publically accessible spaces (POPS) and watercourses”; 2. By replacing policy 5.3.1.b with the following: “The lot must abut at least two public realms (with the exception of a POPS as per policy 5.3.1.e)”; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Document 2 – Uptown Rideau Street Community Design Plan of the staff report be amended as follows: 1. By replacing the existing definition of “public realm” proposed in Section 4.4 with the following: “The public realm in the CDP area includes streets, publicly accessible pathways and lanes, parks, privately owned publically accessible spaces (POPS) and watercourses.”; 2. By modifying the list of conditions for density redistribution identified in Section 4.3.2 to be consistent with those found in Section 5.3.1 of Document 3; 3. By clarifying the meaning of “floor plate” in Section 4.3.7: “Floor Plate means the total floor area