Taken from the roll call in the town’s own minutes. The minutes record who was not there and almost never why.
What was decided (3 motions)
2 carried, 1 recorded otherwise. Every motion below is printed as the minutes print it.
WHEREAS there are clear and unresolved issues with this application that are still under negotiation between the City and the Applicant; BE IT THEREFORE RESOLVED THAT this matter be
Moved by J. Leiper
Referred
WHEREAS the staff report describes the building as “stacked plank” construction; and WHEREAS the building is in fact simply a wood framed building with plank walls that are not structural; THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that references to “stacked plank” structure be replaced with “wood frame building” on page 5 of the report; and THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that staff be directed to request an amendment to Document 5 to reflect this change in the Water and Fire damage engineering report.
Moved by C. Legault
Carried
BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Built Heritage Committee allow discussion of this item for consideration by the committee at today’s meeting, pursuant to subsection 89(4) of the Procedure By-law (being by-law no. 2022-410) to allow for presentation and questions to staff.